------- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-07 12:13 ------- Note that I think it is good that we always have a return decl. So this PR is IMHO invalid (or at least we wont fix it for a reason). There is PR27800 which is IMHO valid.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27798
