------- Comment #20 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2008-12-16 12:47 ------- (In reply to comment #19) > Re. comment #18, I'd say "brilliant" if it wasn't such a poor performance :-)
I agree... quite an achievement not to crash in such a case. > Did you manage to get a time report out of that run? no... obviously I can rerun this (numbers tomorrow, of course)? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38474