------- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-26 16:02 ------- That brings us back to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-11/msg00532.html If the gimplifier shouldn't drop TREE_OVERFLOW bits from the IL, then it is valid to have TREE_OVERFLOWs set and tree-vrp.c needs to deal with it (use VARYING range or something similar).
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38934
