------- Comment #22 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-29 12:52 ------- (In reply to comment #21) > Created an attachment (id=17210) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17210&action=view) [edit] > Alternative patch suggested > This is the patch I test at the moment.
The patch I posted works for w64 without any regressions. For linux64 it needs to be tested, too. I have here at work no linux64 box. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39002
