------- Comment #13 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-30 16:11 ------- (In reply to comment #12) > > For source codes [a-k]*, there where 906 occurrences of the "set but > not used" warning from Intel C/C++. >
@dcb I think nobody is discussing that we would want such warning (in some form or another) in GCC. We do not need more rationale or evidence supporting it. We need someone to write the patch. Just that. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18624
