------- Comment #13 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-02-03 11:34 ------- (In reply to comment #12) > What if we forbid altogether memory operands and we *synthesize* them with a > peephole2? Anyway, it seems safe to me to declare this a dup of PR38824?
I think that we will hit PR 19398 then... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38134
