------- Comment #2 from gerald at pfeifer dot com 2009-02-03 10:03 ------- Latest testruns confirm this as fixed: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-02/msg00249.html
Only four failures remain, and these are different from what has been reported here: === libgomp tests === Running target unix FAIL: libgomp.fortran/condinc2.f -O (test for excess errors) WARNING: libgomp.fortran/condinc2.f -O compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libgomp.fortran/condinc4.f90 -O (test for excess errors) WARNING: libgomp.fortran/condinc4.f90 -O compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libgomp.fortran/omp_cond2.f -O (test for excess errors) WARNING: libgomp.fortran/omp_cond2.f -O compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libgomp.fortran/omp_cond4.F90 -O (test for excess errors) WARNING: libgomp.fortran/omp_cond4.F90 -O compilation failed to produce executable === libgomp Summary === # of expected passes 2333 # of unexpected failures 4 # of unsupported tests 2 -- gerald at pfeifer dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35114