------- Comment #1 from corinl at gmx dot de 2009-02-08 22:07 ------- Oh sorry, I just see that "buf" could be used uninitialized for sure (if xl==NULL). but well, shouldn't this warning then be issued all the times? so the bug is now reversed -> "missing warning" instead of "false warning" ;)
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39133
