------- Comment #5 from caroline dot rioux at ca dot ibm dot com 2009-02-18 22:15 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Nope, only currently 4.2 and above are being maintained. Is there a reason > why > you unlikely to move to 4.x in the short term?
We have a big code base and changing compilers is done seldom and very carefully. This bug will be one more reason to move though, so that's good :) Is there any way you would know exactly what the bug is in this case? Is it a leak, or that the memory is not free'd through delete, or that the overloaded operator is not called when it should? I searched the bug database but couldn't find anything similar. Thanks again! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39237
