[Bug c/39525] [easy to fix bug] Docs for C99 "designated initializers" isn't clear what happens to omitted field members

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-03-23 13:30 -------
Hmm, how so?  The C standard is clear that these fields are zero initialized if
omitted.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39525