------- Comment #28 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-04-08 20:20 ------- (In reply to comment #27) > (In reply to comment #26) > > Anyway, newlib patch sent,
Great, thanks. > ...which BTW fixed the regressions, but not the new FAILs. Hm. Wait a minute, by new fails you mean those reported in libstdc++/39629? That is completely different issue. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39644