------- Comment #30 from jason at redhat dot com 2009-04-09 02:10 ------- Subject: Re: deep typedef substitution in error message
dave at boost-consulting dot com wrote: > I can't see why you wouldn't use -fno-deep-typedef-substitution. Because that isn't at all what the option controls. We strip typedefs from template arguments regardless of this flag. Jason -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25185
