------- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-30 13:05 ------- I think this has been fixed by http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146137 http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146290 http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146897 on the trunk.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35463