------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-30 19:01 -------
I think GCC is doing the correct thing here as there is no padding to put
_2_emptyB in. And this is not a zero-size base class optimization but rather
padding filling class optimization.
Have you read the IA64 C++ ABI (or the ARM EABI C++ ABI) to see what it has to
say about this case?
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|critical |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39981
