------- Comment #5 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-13 14:51 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > That's what dg-require-profiling does. > > IMHO this is a deficiency in your glibc. It's very hard to distinguish between > "something is subtly busted" and "my glibc sucks", so I'm not sure fixing this > is appropriate for fsf gcc. >
Given this bit here, can this now be closed as WONTFIX ? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38703
