------- Comment #4 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-18 05:49 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > ... so this is actually a duplicate of bug 18501. > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18501 ***
The loopness distinction for duplicate-marker seems bogus: PR22456 has a while-loop. The test-case for PR18501 has a for-loop. This one doesn't have a loop. Just saying, again. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40469
