------- Comment #13 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-07 15:27 ------- (In reply to comment #12) > > You were right - contiguous does need initializing. Not for this case but > > some of the other uses that I referred to. > Paul, what is the plan? You had a 4.4 and 4.5 check in, contiguous is not > initialized in 4.5. Do you want to fix that?
I somehow missed that it was checked in as part of PR 40646, http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&revision=149262. Thus: I think this PR be closed, can it? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40551