------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-11 18:19 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Subject: Re: [LTO] complains about two tentative > definitions > > On Sat, 11 Jul 2009, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > ------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-11 18:05 > > ------- > > Note this is only true for the non -fno-common case. Really this is an > > extension to the standard C language but we should support it. > > You mean it is only true for -fcommon (which is the default)?
What I write is the same as what your wrote (I had two negatives ;) . -- Pinski -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40721
