------- Comment #6 from dave at boost-consulting dot com 2009-07-28 18:42 ------- The next step would be to verify that the penalty is eliminated when using boost::function / tr1::function
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40874
[Bug tree-optimization/40874] Function object abstraction penalty with inline functions.
dave at boost-consulting dot com Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:42:38 -0700
- [Bug c++/40874] New: Function object ... dave at boost-consulting dot com
- [Bug tree-optimization/40874] Fun... pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug tree-optimization/40874] Fun... pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug tree-optimization/40874] Fun... dave at boost-consulting dot com
- [Bug tree-optimization/40874] Fun... paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
- [Bug tree-optimization/40874] Fun... rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug tree-optimization/40874] Fun... dave at boost-consulting dot com
- [Bug tree-optimization/40874] Fun... paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
- [Bug tree-optimization/40874] Fun... jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug tree-optimization/40874] Fun... rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug tree-optimization/40874] Fun... rguenther at suse dot de
- [Bug tree-optimization/40874] Fun... hubicka at ucw dot cz
- [Bug tree-optimization/40874] Fun... rguenther at suse dot de
- [Bug tree-optimization/40874] Fun... jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug tree-optimization/40874] Fun... rguenther at suse dot de
