Subject says it all; i386-apple-darwin is a primary platform.

Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs
Bootstrap comparison failure!
gcc/tree.o differs

The output of "../trunk/contrib/compare-debug --preserve stage[23]-gcc/tree.o"
is long, so I'll attach it, but the end of it says:

stage2-gcc/tree.o.stripped stage3-gcc/tree.o.stripped differ: char 529, line 4
stripping off .eh_frame, then retrying
failed to strip off .eh_frame
stage2-gcc/tree.o.stripped stage3-gcc/tree.o.stripped differ: char 529, line 4
preserving stage2-gcc/tree.o.stripped stage3-gcc/tree.o.stripped


I also did a dwarfdump of both stripped files, and the difference between those
two is minimal:

--- dwarfdump2  2009-09-03 15:55:53.000000000 +0200
+++ dwarfdump3  2009-09-03 15:55:57.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- File: stage2-gcc/tree.o.stripped (i386)
+ File: stage3-gcc/tree.o.stripped (i386)
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 .debug_info contents:

@@ -32812,7 +32812,7 @@

 0x0001c7d3:         TAG_lexical_block [88] *
                      AT_ranges( 0x00000240
-                        [0x00001328 - 0x00001395)
+                        [0x0000132c - 0x00001395)
                         [0x00001398 - 0x0000139a)
                          End )


So I guess this should be easier to understand than the corresponding powerpc
issue (41224).


-- 
           Summary: [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap broken on I386-apple-darwin9
                    at revision 151373
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: build
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: bootstrap
        AssignedTo: aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: i386-apple-darwin9.8.0
  GCC host triplet: i386-apple-darwin9.8.0
GCC target triplet: i386-apple-darwin9.8.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41245

Reply via email to