------- Comment #7 from rsc at swtch dot com 2009-09-09 23:30 -------
There is a difference between warnings about things that might
be wrong in your code and warnings about things that are definitely wrong.
This is one of the latter, and it is a shame that it's not already an error
by default. I understand the historical rationale but it is still unfortunate.
integer/pointer without a cast is another one. If I could make these
errors I most certainly would. As it is I run gcc in a wrapper script
and exit 1 if gcc emits that particular warning.
--
rsc at swtch dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rsc at swtch dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37866
