------- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-10-20 02:45 ------- In fact, I have only *extended* the existing static_asserts to cover the type too, not just the bounds, thus avoiding the legacy simulated concept checks. In general, I followed the existing practice about negative vs positive.
I think the real confusion is that in general we want to talk about *arguments* not *parameters*, therefore we want to say "argument substituting _UIntType not an unsigned integral type", and "template argument substituting __m out of bounds". I'm in favor of that change. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41759
