------- Comment #16 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-08 23:27 ------- It's not clear to me that there's anything to be fixed; the reduced testcase in this PR works, and the testcase for 17910 seems to work the way the point of instantiation rules say it ought to. And people can always use explicit instantiation directives to control order of initialization.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10112
