------- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-15 16:00 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> Wouldn't it be more obvious to check for attr.result or something like that?
Tobias, I don't quite see how that would work. Simply checking for attr.result
is surely not enough. After all this construct is only allowed if we're inside
the new_field function ...
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42048
