------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-01 18:33 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > It would be possible to avoid the default construction by replacing that > member > with two overloads of resize, but I'm not sure it's worth doing.
The C++03 standard only lists the function with the default value so this is invalid. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42242