------- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-04 15:57 ------- > (In reply to comment #3) > Richard is probably right, it should be clearly marked against the branch,
I have now set "Reported against" to 'fortran-dev', marked it in the Subject line and in 'known to work/fail' Backtrace: mio_pointer_ref (gp=0x28) at /home/tob/projects/fortran-dev/gcc/fortran/module.c:2237 2237 p = get_pointer (*((char **) gp)); (gdb) bt #0 mio_pointer_ref (gp=0x28) at /home/tob/projects/fortran-dev/gcc/fortran/module.c:2237 #1 0x00000000004f8da9 in mio_symbol_ref (symp=<value optimized out>) at /home/tob/projects/fortran-dev/gcc/fortran/module.c:2498 #2 0x00000000004f90e9 in mio_typebound_proc (proc=0x154b908) at /home/tob/projects/fortran-dev/gcc/fortran/module.c:3352 #3 0x00000000004fa344 in mio_component (c=0x154b880) at /home/tob/projects/fortran-dev/gcc/fortran/module.c:2362 -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Known to fail| |fortran-dev Known to work| |4.5.0 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-12-04 15:57:20 date| | Summary|ICE: segmentation fault |[fortran-dev Regression] | |ICE: segmentation fault Version|unknown |fortran-dev http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42274