------- Comment #5 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-12-22 10:48 ------- I'm planning to send a patch for feedback in the next 48 hours, including everything except atomic_future, because I think we need to implement [util.smartptr.shared.atomic] to support atomic_future
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42201