------- Comment #2 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-01-07 20:56 -------
The patch in comment #1 contained a few silly typos.  Here's a better one:
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00350.html>.  Can you try it?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42525

Reply via email to