------- Comment #2 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-07 20:56 ------- The patch in comment #1 contained a few silly typos. Here's a better one: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00350.html>. Can you try it?
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42525