------- Comment #23 from jingyu at google dot com 2010-01-15 22:25 -------
Subject: Re: [4.4/4.5 regression] problematic
REG_EQUAL note added to SUBREG
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:59 PM, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
<gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
>
> ------- Comment #21 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-15 21:59
> -------
> FYI, if you always want to test a NaN, you'd need to use big endian ordering
> for some arches,
If the floating point format is compatible with IEEE754,
on little-endian machine, double float 0x7ff0,0000,0000,0000 means an
infinite number.
on big-endian machine, double float 0x7ff0,0000,0000,0000 means a very
small number.
Then this test does not have problem.
>plus there are targets which don't support NaN at all or where
> a double isn't as big as 4 shorts.
This is troublesome.
We need to limit the test case to run on machines where
sizeof(double)=4*sizeof(short) only.
Any idea how to add conditions to the test case?
Thanks for pointing it out!
>
>
> --
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42691
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
> You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
>
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42691
