------- Comment #3 from david dot kirkby at onetel dot net 2010-01-16 14:29
-------
(In reply to comment #2)
> Confirmed. However, this has really low priority: the C++ standard is not
> a superset of the C99 standard, so a number of things new to C99 are not
> part of C++, and this is one of them. If you want to write portable code,
> you should use the std::complex class. If you have cases where you can show
> that std::complex is slower than using the C99 means, we'd be happy to
> accept bug reports.
>
> Thanks
> Wolfgang
Note this bug, which you considered as low priority since it applied to using C
code with the C++ compiler, is not limited to the C++ compiler. Take a look at
#42753 where you will see this bug stops one building C code if using gcc.
--
david dot kirkby at onetel dot net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |david dot kirkby at onetel
| |dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21057
