------- Comment #2 from piotr dot wyderski at gmail dot com 2010-01-26 17:35 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > probably a dup of Bug 42082 or Bug 42737
Yes, it could be the case. BTW, Jason, is the presented way of discovering of the lambda function's return type correct in C++0x? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42877
