------- Comment #6 from davidxl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-03 18:30 -------
See discussions in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-02/msg00138.html
about changing dynamic types using placement new -- it is basically not allowed
-- so the optimization is valid.
David
--
davidxl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |davidxl at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2008-11-29 22:42:58 |2010-02-03 18:30:00
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35560
