------- Comment #8 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-04 10:48 ------- Created an attachment (id=19803) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19803&action=view) Possible patch
I've been testing the attached patch on ARM (well, thumb) where there's a similar issue. It's perhaps a bit more aggressive than it needs to be, but it should solve the problem generically rather than requiring each back-end to implement hacks for what is really a MI issue. Could someone test this on PPC? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30282
