------- Comment #9 from marc dot glisse at normalesup dot org 2010-02-06 17:52 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > It seems this can be safely closed as invalid, there is no reason why > std::__cos should be wrong.
Marking this as invalid means that we can never include solaris libc headers with __cplusplus >= 199711 (which declare std::__cos as a function) without fixincluding them beyond recognition. Even without this problem on solaris, using in libstdc++ names as generic as std::__cos for a functionality limited to valarray doesn't seem like an ideal naming convention. But then, the choice is yours, I am not ticking the "reopen" box. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27340
