------- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-17 21:32
-------
(In reply to comment #11)
> Mark, with your permission, I'm restoring P3: indeed, strictly speaking the
> failure of that specific testcase isn't a regression, because it didn't exist
> in gcc4.4.x, but I understand it uncovered a rather subtle problem in the C++
> front-end. Anyway, I agree that we should figure out a plain C++ testcase,
> outside the libstdc++ testsuite, which fails only in 4.5, otherwise, I will
> understand if you release managers eventually decide to xfail the library
> testcase. But Jason is on it already... ;)
The C++ FE issue is a regression (we removed the expr_size langhook) that
causes wrong-code.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P1
Summary|20_util/bind/ref2.cc FAILs |[4.5 Regression]
| |20_util/bind/ref2.cc FAILs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43075
