------- Comment #6 from uwe at netbsd dot org 2010-02-22 04:47 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > What confuses me is that explictly qualifying the offending call as > > Node::test(op.i) > > makes it compile correctly.
I mean as far as I understand Node::test should resolve to the same sibling, so your explanation of why the original fails should still be applicable. Yet it works. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43135
