------- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-22 23:23 ------- I don't think this should be P1, as getting the old behavior is apparently doable by hand, but I'm a big fan of backwards-compatibility and if the GCS haven't been updated then I think that GCC (as a GNU package) ought to try to follow that.
Thanks, -- Mark -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43132