------- Comment #4 from mh+gcc at glandium dot org 2010-03-02 17:48 ------- > Because it can be used for the backtrace when debugging. Without a frame > pointer on x86/x86_64, you cannot get a real backtrace without unwinding info.
So, in case I build with -g, I can just use -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables safely ? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43232