------- Comment #4 from mh+gcc at glandium dot org  2010-03-02 17:48 -------
> Because it can be used for the backtrace when debugging.  Without a frame
> pointer on x86/x86_64, you cannot get a real backtrace without unwinding info.

So, in case I build with -g, I can just use -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables
safely ?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43232

Reply via email to