Follow up to PR 43173 - but this time for derived types.

In the following calls, if the ultimate component is a non-pointer and all
previous part-refs have no vector subscripts, there is no need for packing the
argument (i.e. creating a temporary).

However, if the ultimate component is a pointer, one needs to pack as the test
case also shows.

Correctness test fails with
  4.5.0 20100218 (experimental) [trunk revision 156860]
  4.5.0 20100303 (experimental)
but works with
  4.4.2 [gcc-4_4-branch revision 155966]
  4.3.4 [gcc-4_3-branch revision 152973]



module m
  type t
    integer, allocatable :: a(:)
    integer, pointer :: b(:)
    integer :: c(5)
  end type t
end module m

subroutine foo(a,d,e,n)
  use m
  implicit none
  integer :: n
  type(t) :: a
  type(t), allocatable :: d(:)
  type(t), pointer :: e(:)
  call bar(   a%a) ! OK - no array temp needed
  call bar(   a%c) ! OK - no array temp needed

  call bar(   a%a(1:n)) ! Missed: No pack needed
  call bar(   a%b(1:n)) ! OK: pack needed
  call bar(   a%c(1:n)) ! Missed: No pack needed

  call bar(d(1)%a(1:n)) ! Missed: No pack needed
  call bar(d(1)%b(1:n)) ! OK: pack needed
  call bar(d(1)%c(1:n)) ! Missed: No pack needed

  call bar(e(1)%a(1:n)) ! Missed: No pack needed
  call bar(e(1)%b(1:n)) ! OK: pack needed
  call bar(e(1)%c(1:n)) ! Missed: No pack needed
end subroutine foo

use m
implicit none
integer :: i
integer, target :: z(6)
type(t) :: y

z = [(i, i=1,6)]
y%b => z(::2)
call bar(y%b)
end

subroutine bar(x)
  integer :: x(1:*)
  print *, x(1:3)
  if (any (x(1:3) /= [1,3,5])) call abort ()
end subroutine bar


-- 
           Summary: [4.5 Regression] Missing array temp for DT with pointer
                    component
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: wrong-code, missed-optimization
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
OtherBugsDependingO 42361
             nThis:


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43243

Reply via email to