------- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-03 22:53 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > It is a dup of PR 24581. Backporting the gcc/tree-complex.c change > in revision 147281: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=147281 > > to 4.4 fixes this.
If that is the case, then this code is invalid as there are no signed zeros in Fortran :). Let's reopen it until further notice because I think there is something else going on. I think after that patch we just don't vectorizing the code which is what you are seeing. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|DUPLICATE | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43251