------- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-03 22:53 -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> It is a dup of PR 24581. Backporting the gcc/tree-complex.c change
> in revision 147281:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=147281
>
> to 4.4 fixes this.
If that is the case, then this code is invalid as there are no signed zeros in
Fortran :).
Let's reopen it until further notice because I think there is something else
going on. I think after that patch we just don't vectorizing the code which is
what you are seeing.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|DUPLICATE |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43251
