------- Comment #7 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-05 23:14 ------- It seems like the problem is in the overly conservative implementation of add_param_constraints, as we do not insert bounds for pointers:
if (!INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)) return; and in the original testcase we have a pointer parameter z: foo (int x, int y, int *z) { ... if (z) b = d * *z; ... } -- spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |spop at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2010-03-02 20:31:04 |2010-03-05 23:14:28 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43065