------- Comment #2 from erh+gcc at nimenees dot com 2010-03-06 21:34 ------- So does this mean bug #13687 is going to be reopened? Or is there some workaround that hasn't been mentioned?
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43272
------- Comment #2 from erh+gcc at nimenees dot com 2010-03-06 21:34 ------- So does this mean bug #13687 is going to be reopened? Or is there some workaround that hasn't been mentioned?
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43272