------- Comment #3 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2010-03-20 11:26 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> class Foo;
> Foo* f();
> int main() {
> Foo* p = f();
> delete [] p;
> }
I can't see how the compiler could possibly do anything useful in this case
if Foo is incomplete. I can't find any statement that would say that the code
is ill-formed, however.
If there really is no such statement, I still don't think we should make it a
priority to compile this code without an error.
W.
--
bangerth at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bangerth at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43452
