------- Comment #10 from dougmencken at gmail dot com 2010-04-27 20:48 ------- And may I repeat, please? It's definitely not-x86[_64] bug. I don't know can it be revealed with cross toolchain (because all of you do test gcc only and only on x86[_64] as host). So, if you don't have an access to real powerpc hardware, you can test it in some emulator (like qemu). Also to reproduce you can try to bootstrap native gcc > 4.4.2 on some real/emulated powerpc host (*not* i386 nor i486 nor i586 nor i586mmx nor i686 nor x86_64 etc.).
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43911
