------- Comment #4 from kirr at landau dot phys dot spbu dot ru 2010-05-04
07:44 -------
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 07:45:20PM -0000, dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> (In reply to comment #2)
> On Monday 03 May 2010 21:23:26 you wrote:
> > And when I say "it used to work" I don't mean generating dependencies for
> > f90/f95 sources (PR31588 mentions e.g. USE), but only generating
> > dependencies from plain preprocessor.
>
> What you ask for is "just" a subset of PR31588. If that gets fixed, your
> request will be fixed as well.
>
> Feel free to re-open if you believe that it would be worth to fix the subset
> first.
Yes, it's a subset of PR31588.
But as you wrote PR31588 is going to be (maybe) fixed for 4.6, while I
believe regressions in general and this one in particular should be
better handled with higher priority and fixes should go to maintanance
branches.
Also, my impression is that PR31588 is more work than fixing "just" this
subset. That's why I'm reopening it.
Sorry if I ask for too much, especially when I can't help with code...
> > If that would help I'm able and will be glad to try patches and do
> > other testing as well.
>
> I'll keep that in mind :)
Yes
Thanks,
Kirill
--
kirr at landau dot phys dot spbu dot ru changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|DUPLICATE |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43954
