------- Comment #11 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-05-04 12:31 ------- I belive this problem also shows on powerpc64-linux-gnu, configured with --with-long-double-128 [1]:
FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass28-frag.cxx (-static) (test for excess errors) WARNING: libmudflap.c++/pass28-frag.cxx (-static) compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (-static) (test for excess errors) WARNING: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (-static) compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx (-static) (test for excess errors) WARNING: libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx (-static) compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass57-frag.cxx (-static) (test for excess errors) WARNING: libmudflap.c++/pass57-frag.cxx (-static) compilation failed to produce executable It looks that long-double support in libstdc++ is broken for certain symbols. [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-05/msg00285.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43968
