------- Comment #10 from dougsemler at gmail dot com  2010-05-10 17:18 -------
Well, is it really invalid code with -std=c++0x?

The virutal destructor seems to be causing the issue.

With gcc 4.4.3 (after changing virtual ~base() to virtual void func()):

$ g++ gcc_bug.cc 
gcc_bug.cc: In function ‘int main()’:
gcc_bug.cc:9: warning: extended initializer lists only available with
-std=c++0x or -std=gnu++0x

$ g++ gcc_bug.cc  -std=c++0x
$


So you can see that g++ sees this as valid code.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44045

Reply via email to