------- Comment #4 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr  2010-05-17 09:08 -------
> You had to revert 159371 in addition to the patch:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-05/msg01119.html
> 
> or instead of that patch?

Sorry for the confusion. 

In my powerpc-apple-darwin9 tree I have the patch in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-05/msg01119.html for a quite long time
(and I guess it is not applied in the "native" tree of regress). With revision
159371, I see the same failures as regress. These failures disappear if I
revert revision 159371 without any other change in my tree.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44163

Reply via email to