------- Comment #4 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-05-17 09:08 ------- > You had to revert 159371 in addition to the patch: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-05/msg01119.html > > or instead of that patch?
Sorry for the confusion. In my powerpc-apple-darwin9 tree I have the patch in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-05/msg01119.html for a quite long time (and I guess it is not applied in the "native" tree of regress). With revision 159371, I see the same failures as regress. These failures disappear if I revert revision 159371 without any other change in my tree. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44163
