------- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 14:40 ------- Hm, we still have TYPE_DECLs in TYPE_FIELDs somehow. I have a patch.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44196
[Bug lto/44196] lto1: ICE: tree check: expected field_decl, have type_decl in gimple_types_compatible_p, at gimple.c:3597
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org Wed, 19 May 2010 07:40:53 -0700
- [Bug lto/44196] New: lto1: int... martin dot kronbichler at it dot uu dot se
- [Bug lto/44196] lto1: inte... martin dot kronbichler at it dot uu dot se
- [Bug lto/44196] lto1: ICE:... rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug lto/44196] lto1: ICE:... rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug lto/44196] lto1: ICE:... rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug lto/44196] lto1: ICE:... rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug lto/44196] lto1: ICE:... rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug lto/44196] lto1: ICE:... hubicka at ucw dot cz
- [Bug lto/44196] lto1: ICE:... rguenther at suse dot de
- [Bug lto/44196] lto1: ICE:... rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug lto/44196] lto1: ICE:... rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug lto/44196] lto1: ICE:... rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug lto/44196] lto1: ICE:... rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
