------- Comment #2 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-04 15:50 ------- I am going to close this as WONTFIX for the following reasons:
* We do not want this because: a) We have too many options. b) These options would be of very limited and temporary use but we will have to support them forever. c) c++0x features are spread all over the compiler -> this is hard to implement properly as an after-thought. d) The additional checking will slow down the compiler for no significant gain. We are too slow already. * We have too many open PRs, so it is not worth it to keep this open just in case. Sorry about this but I hope you can understand. -- manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu dot org Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44244